 |
| Adriean Videanu |
|
The General Mayor of Bucharest, Adriean Videanu, said in an
exclusive interview with Bucharest Daily News that the European Commission
Delegation to Romania might be used to make public the city hall?s projects.
The statement came after a dispute with the EC Delegation head, who said
Bucharest does not deserve to be a European capital. Videanu and Sheele met
last Friday to try and find solutions to improve Bucharest?s
situation.
Videanu admitted Bucharest has major problems, such as the chaotic traffic,
the inefficient public administration and bad public transport. However, the
mayor said he has solutions for each of these issues.
Videanu warned the citizens of Bucharest that modernizing the city involves
sacrifice, so they should not be surprised if things get worse next year
because of the work that will block traffic and make the city look like a
working site.
The general mayor defended the city of Bucharest, saying it will always be
a European capital, despite its huge deficiencies and problems.
You just had a meeting with Jonathan Scheele, the head of the
European Commission's Delegation in Bucharest, who a few days ago said
Bucharest does not deserve to be a European capital. What did you discuss
with him?
We tried to clarify some of the aspects of his statement and we reached
the conclusion that the lack of communication was to blame.
What I wanted to clarify was that Bucharest will always be Romania's
capital, with all its problems, and that Bucharest will always be a European
capital, with all its problems.
I never disputed the problems of Bucharest, which are real and visible for
each citizen. But he made a statement influenced by his emotions, which led
to a misrepresentation, in my opinion, taking into consideration that he is
a European official. One must be careful, from this point of view.
That's why we wanted to present to him the modernization plan in detail for
the 2005-2008 period and we agreed to organize a joint event.
What will this event consist of?
We would like to use the European Commission to make the city hall's
projects public. This way the Commission will be a point of reference for
the image of City Hall's plans.
After the first eight months of your term as general mayor, what are
the achievements that make you most proud?
The development plan for Bucharest for 2005-2008, which determined the
priorities that can be subsidized. Bucharest has a huge number of problems
and we would need almost unlimited resources for these problems to be
solved. So I tried to realistically determine the resources I can use by
2008 and I have selected some of the problems which I want to solve by the
end of my term.
Tell me some of these problems that you plan to solve by
2008.
First of all, those related to the traffic in Bucharest. And I have to
give you a bad news: in the next two years, the traffic will be even worse
than now because we will start the infrastructure work that will block
certain access ways, but I have no other solution. But things will be better
in the third year, when I will have solved a large number of these problems.
When I am talking about the traffic, I am referring both to the street
infrastructure and to the underground infrastructure, because I can not do
things only half way. I will begin with the underground infrastructure and
then I will modernize the surface one. I launched eight design studies for
street decorations and, implicitly, for the advertising in Bucharest. I also
launched a study of the townscape, because we can afford, for example, along
Elisabeta Boulevard to have wax cherry trees planted. Bucharest needs
quality trees that give it the range of a European city. We have also
launched the pre-feasibility studies for the 22 underground parking garages
in the central area, which will offer about 15,000 to 17,000 parking spaces.
We also have started the traffic master plan that is aimed at solving the
problem of one way streets, correlated with widening the streets by reducing
the sidewalks, in order to make parking lots on both sides of the street.
Moreover, together with the underground parking I spoke about earlier, this
will also solve the problem of parking in Bucharest. Nevertheless, these
lateral parking spaces will be placed on secondary streets, not on main
ones.
We have also finalized the auction for 500 new buses, we finished the public
debate on the Basarab passage and we will soon have the environment approval
in order to start the auction.
The street infrastructure upgrade will be carried out simultaneously with
repairing the sidewalks, placing street decorations and planting trees. We
want to solve them all in the same time.
Won't it take much longer this way?
Yes, it will. It will take longer, but it will be much cheaper and less
bothersome for the population, because once you disturb them by renovating
the infrastructure, it is better to solve all the other problems, so you
don't disturb them several times in the same area.
Are you prepared for the citizens' negative reaction?
Yes. I always say that it is going to be a big problem - a great
disturbance in Bucharest in the next two years. I assume this risk, both as
a human being and as a politician, but I can not do things half way. This is
my way of being. I hope that people will fairly judge the actions I take, as
we should not solve things only in appearance, as it has happened most of
the time.
How will you subsidize these projects of modernizing the
city?
This is also one of the great achievements, as we have set the premises
for the subsidizing for all the projects. We organized a city hall bonds
issue and we obtained 500 million euros, the biggest amount Romania ever
gained in the last 15 years.
The most important thing we obtained from this bond issue is the city hall's
credibility on the capital market. At the moment I have an avalanche of
requests for subsidizing from all international financial institutions; from
all the big international banks, such as the European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the European Investment Bank (EIB),
the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation, the ABM-AMRO
commercial banks, Citibank. They are all interested in subsidizing the city
hall projects, which is something extraordinary. When the subsidizer is the
one that makes the request, you have the necessary conditions for the costs
to be very small. In addition, there are the Romanian banks, such as the
Romanian Commercial Bank (BCR), Raiffeisen and BRD that also want to
subsidize the city hall's projects. But the most important thing for me is a
strategic partnership with the European Investment Bank that will offer a
credit line to City Hall, which is a new thing in the subsidizing filed in
Romania. A credit line from an international institution that will guarantee
the subsidy for all the projects we have initiated.
How will Bucharest look in 2006?
Worse. We will initiate work at the beginning of the year and the capital
will look like a worksite. The work will block traffic. But I have to say
that there is no other way. We will suffer for a while, but afterwards the
horizon will brighten up.
A much debated subject over this year was the modernization of the
historic center in Bucharest, part of the city hall's projects. The
Association of the Investors in the Historic Center (AICI), including
foreign investors in the area, have complained that their businesses are
going very bad because of the area's isolation. What news do you have for
them?
We often communicate and....
Nevertheless, they accused you of lack of communication...
They were unfair by making such accusations. I already had three meetings
with the representatives of the investors in the historic center. Listening
to their complaints, I allowed taxis free access in the area and I
established three taxi stations around the historic center. I have
prohibited the traffic because we can not go back to the previous chaotic
situation in the historic center. At the moment we are auctioning the
infrastructure work. In the historic center investors' benefit, I want the
work to last about two years, and not 20 years, if we would allow the
traffic in the area. The taxis will have specific routes determined by us,
but their presence set the premises for the businesses to continue in the
historic center. For the first time in the last 50 or 60 years, work in the
historic center is initiated, we have the subsidy, and we have all the study
ready, we have the projects approved. We also ended the final stage, which
was the analysis of the underground infrastructure so we can have all the
data about the area when we start the work. Thus we preferred to lose more
time with making projects and finding all the information about the area,
this way saving more time for the actual work.
The investors in the historic center have accused you of not having a
concrete plan of modernizing this area. How do you comment on these
accusations?
I can not solve their ignorance. They have the possibility to inform
themselves and I am convinced that I am dealing with people who have the
capacity to get the information. Moreover, I myself had several meetings
with them, I showed them the projects. Of course, I can not talk with them
every week or every month, because time doesn't allow me to.
And what were their reactions?
Ones of understanding. Out of their seven requests, I agreed with
five.
Which were the requests you accepted?
Among them was the better illumination in the area, which is proceeding
at the moment, the access of taxis, and the station of taxis in the
area.
And the ones you refused to accept?
The free access of cars and another one that I cannot remember at the
moment. Nobody can say that I did not agree to have talks with them, when I
had the time.
Another problem many foreigners complained about was the public
administration. Even the British Ambassador, Quinton Quayle, said the public
worker does not work for the citizen, but for his own interest. Moreover,
your message to public workers after you were elected was "maximum
efficiency in minimum time." However, the situation has not much improved in
the last eight months. What measures will you take in order to improve this
situation?
One of the first things I did when I took over my position was an
evaluation of the human resources I have and I work with. The conclusion of
this evaluation was that we have a big problem. And the biggest problem is
that, taking into consideration the quality of the public workers, those who
actually work with citizens are the communication both inside the structures
part of City Hall, between departments, and communication with the citizens.
That is why I began a program of training for the human resources I work
with; I don't believe in the solution of rapid changes, I believe that it is
better to give the person a chance, to tell him where he is wrong. This was
the evaluation I made. Each person received a report of his or her activity,
that person and I are the only ones who know everything about him or her. Of
course, I am referring to the departments' managers because I could not test
all City Hall's employees. So each manager knows the minuses and pluses in
the report and the field that needs more training and improvement. At the
beginning of next year I will carry out a new evaluation and if I will see
there is no improvement, I will have to dismiss that person.
I admit that unfortunately, at the moment the public administration does not
respect its task, we have very many things to do about it, but it is a
process that can not be changed in one or two years, but a much longer
period of time.
Many foreign citizens have complained about the problems of public
transport, such as the bad quality of buses, their small number on several
routes which leads to crowding and so on. What are your solutions for busses
in public transport?
Yes, it is true. Yesterday I announced the winner of the auction for 500
new buses and starting in March we will bring the Mercedes buses in
Bucharest, which will undoubtedly increase the quality of public transport.
We will bring 400 buses next year and 100 in 2007. We will also initiate an
auction for buying 50 trams and 100 trolleybuses, and they might be very new
models, so the quality of public transport will increase. Of course, those
complain about this are right, but I will solve their worries once we will
bring these buses. You should know that everything is connected: we are
modernizing the infrastructure; we are buying buses, so they will not be
driven on bad roads, this way damaging them in a few days.
Who is to blame for all these problems you admit Bucharest
has?
I would like to talk about the period starting with 2000, as I know the
situation very well. If President Traian Basescu (Traian Basescu was General
Mayor from 2000 to 2004) would have been allowed to carry on this term
properly and the legislation would not have been modified in order to
restrict the general mayor and increasing those of district mayors,
transforming the city into six different cities, if Traian Basescu would
have been allowed to continue the infrastructure projects, which were the
result of a study carried out in 1999 by a prestigious Japanese company,
things would have been better now. The absurd political fight led by the
former General Council and by the Social Democratic Party led to nothing
being done in Bucharest for many years, not to mention that before 2000
almost nothing was done in Bucharest, when talking about the major
infrastructure projects. It was well known that Bucharest has a 100 year old
sewage system, that it has a network of drinkable water that does not
respect the standards, that it has an incredibly bad network of cables. I am
the general mayor, I assume all these problems although I am not blame for
them, but it is my job to find solutions. Of course, the resources are
limited, and, as I have told you, I established the quantity of resources
for the projects I selected to finalize before 2008 from the huge number of
problems.
Lately you had some differences with the Social Democratic
councilors, who accused you having run City Hall from an airplane lately,
due to your many visits abroad.
I am sorry about their lack of horizon. The general mayor is the one that
represents City Hall abroad and I believed it was important to continue
having a very good collaboration with the International Association of the
Francophone Mayors, of which the Bucharest mayor is a member, especially
since next year we will organize in Bucharest the summit of the Francophone
community, which is the reunion of the Francophone states' leaders. This
reunion is preceded by the reunion of Francophone cities' mayors, so I will
be guest of this even, so I had to go to Madagascar to establish the theme
of next year's event and all the other organizational aspects of the even,
as they will be organized both by the Bucharest City Hall and by the
International Association of the Francophone Mayors. I had another visit in
Moscow, as I was especially interested in Moscow's Bank, a bank established
by the Moscow city hall which has exceptional results after 10 years of
functioning. It is a matter that I had to evaluate, if not to imitate. I
also talked with the Moscow mayor the possibility for an interest of our
city hall in finding the best energetic solutions for Bucharest.
I had another visit, but on my own money because the city hall's budget was
reduced, I went to London, where I had a series of meetings with
representatives of banks who are interested in investing in the city hall's
projects.
So in eight months I had three visits abroad, which were not in my personal
interest.
The latest concern when talking about Bucharest is the threat of bird
flu. What measures have you taken for its prevention?
I am also the president of the Anti-epidemic Committee in Bucharest, so I
have the obligation to take preventative measures for eliminating the
appearance of the bird flu. We have decided to set a structure aimed at
permanently monitoring the possibility for the virus to appear. Thus all the
entries and exits of Bucharest are being monitored. Moreover, we prohibited
the commerce of live birds in Bucharest and we asked the citizens not to
consume meat from relatives or relatives outside Bucharest. We restricted
access to the lake areas which have the highest level or risk, taking into
consideration the fact that wild birds gather around lakes.
How would you evaluate the risk of bird flu to appear in
Bucharest?
It exists. That's all I can say, but there is no reason for panic. I
wanted for the responsible authorities to be prepared.
What do you wish for Bucharest in 2006?
I wish for all the studies we have launched in Bucharest to have the
expected results.
source